This makes me want to bang my head against the wall. I HATE THAT WORD. It's so damn generalized and frankly also insulting to be called something that has no flavor of what you are. Am I the only one who feels this way?
2. No Ordinary Beauty
Last time I posted about this too, but it was more in the context of few multiracial romantic interests. Now, I'm just a tad peeved at how often I read about a romantic interest being perfect or tall or lean or strong or buff or having blue or green eyes or etc. etc. In other words, romantic interests that exist in about... what 10% of the population or something? I mean, yes, I read books sometimes to take me into a different reality, but sometimes I really want to read about someone I can believe in, someone who is just an ordinary guy/girl but is so awesome that that's what makes him/her beautiful. (Yes, yes, I'm a romantic. What can I say?)
3. Restrictions
By which I mean that YA is inevitably geared towards younger children and it sometimes loses its appeal for me. I think there are things that it would be fascinating to read about in YA but they're... very curbed and censored... And no, I can't really turn to adult books, because their "non-restriction" often isn't described in a way that appeals to me. (Please, New Adult. Can you work?)
4. Girls in Dresses on Covers
Last time I said photoshopped eyes bugged me. This time it's girls in dresses. Seriously though, not only are we enforcing this dry-cut image of what a girl should be but we're also trapping protagonists by having them be the same girl. Yes, that girl in yet another dress. That girl who has nothing to define her but her fanciful clothing. Surely there are better ways of representing the story AND the protagonist than this one.
5. Avoiding Issues that Are UnpleasantLike insecurities. To me, this makes the protagonist or character more likable. I believe more in a character who has flaws which are explored in the story than the character who never stops to think about... pimples... weight...makeup... their appearance, their personality, how others perceive them, how they perceive themselves... Richelle Mead's Bloodlines is a great example of a book with a protag. who didn't do this--who felt more real to me than any others I've read about recently. But I truly cannot think of very many stories which actually point this out. It may be a bit mundane... but I feel like too many authors take an easy way out by having the protags be beautiful or confident enough to not even think on these issues. I hate that so much. Everybody, even incredibly confident people, has something that ticks at them whether it be something which seems superficial--like your appearance--or something that's more fundamental to who you are. And I want to read about that.
Seriously this also makes me want to bang my head against the wall. Too often girls seem to have no personality... or maybe just nothing unique about them. Is this an author's technique to make it seem more universally applicable, like we can all put ourselves in that situation? We're not all cut of the same mold! I actually enjoy reading about someone who has fire. Also, I don't know about you guys, but hey, if I don't know a guy, he doesn't suddenly approach me and beg me to be his boyfriend (same case with no personality girl).
7. Zombies as the New Vampires.
I heard this one recently... I think it was from the True Blood finale?... but ugh, I sincerely hope this doesn't gain popularity. Zombies are not something I can get on board with, even if you make them "attractive" paranormal creatures (i.e. Die For Me by Amy Plum). Too often, zombies are just plain gross... and I know that YA has a lot of dark, edgy stuff, but zombies hold zero appeal. Death walking? Eating brains? Decaying corpses? Agh. I'm not that sure why I can stomach blood drinking more than I can stomach that, but please no zombies!
Also... a more generalized version of pet peeve = Why do we even need one creature / type of story to be the new 'trend?' (But I get the feeling this is something that will never change.)
8. Romance for the Sake of Romance
Yeah, it's weird to hear this coming from me, but some YA includes romance that shouldn't be there, that doesn't work for the story. I feel like the author only included it because he/she was told that YA can only be successful with it, but that's not true (i.e. read my review of Witchlanders). Yes, I do enjoy a good romance, but not when it's forced or when it's more integral to the story than it should be.
9. When the Protagonist Does Something Really, Really Stupid
The most classic case of this, in my opinion, is in Twilight. Who runs towards a vampire instead of away from one? At least in Vampire Diaries, Elena (in the t.v. show) runs away from Stefan. That seems more like a logical response. One I can identify with, but I'll stop digging at Twilight. I feel like this happens a lot in paranormal stories... like they're to imitate Twilight (okay, okay, now I'll stop ;p).
10. The Mary-Sue
Because inevitably, we've all read one of those books that makes you ask, "did the author just write this so he/she could have this kind of adventure?"
Woohoo! Now, if you count my previous post on Pet Peeves in YA, I'm up to 20 :D. I welcome any and all opinions, even if I said I hate the word 'gorgeous' and you love it. So, what do you think? What are your pet peeves?









7 comments:
I liked Fallen but your are right. I've read all three books and I still don't understand why Daniel and Luce are meant to be together! I barely understand why she dies over and over again. I read Die for Me and I liked it too but it took me awhile to accept that Vincent was a zombie. lol
And oh gosh. I own some books with girls in dresses. Then I read the book and think what does this cover have anything to do with the actually story in the book?
I never realized until now how most of the love interests have blue or green eyes. What happened to hazel or just regular brown eyes like most of the boys I know!
on board with you on most of these. I can't stand the zombies..I have no desire to read about them. I also find I'm getting kind of sick of all the Fey books too. And the love triangles, why is it that two unbelievably attractive guys are always drawn to some boring no personality mary sue?
Oh I completely agree with 2. I honestly don't think I've ever met a boy with grey eyes.. maybe I'm not hanging out with the right ones.
Also, I agree with you (& Jessirae) about girls with dresses.
How can they find ballgowns in a dystopian world?
Sigh, very pretty but also very silly.
I feel like I need to add one: When the heroines describe the love interest as 'smelling like woodsmoke and boy'.
WHAT?! Why are all these boys just chilling near fires?
I love this post. :-D
Excellent post! I agree with #2 the most. Why can't the girl fall in love with your average Joe for once?
I think I agree with most of these, particularly romance for the sake of romance. Sometimes the books really doesn't require it then the author just seems to chuck it in for a few chapters then leave it again. That really bothers me.
As does the love interest catching the MC's eye for no reason. It just makes things so unbelievable and removes all interest I have in their relationship because there doesn't seem to be a point to it.
Great post :D
I love your lists!
Totally agree with you on the no ordinary beauty one. But you know what I dislike even more? When the MC is described as being really plain and no beautiful, and yet every guy within a mile radius of her is in love with her (ahem, Twilight). This goes along with your number six point, which I also agree with. I want to know why they're in love and the best way for me to understand it is when the characters have depth and personality.
I can't get on board with romantic zombies. I'm ok in moderation with the kind of zombies that need killing (like in Enclave), but ew, I just can't like them when they're supposed to be a romantic interest.
I thought The Near Witch would have been just fine without any romance. I liked how Witchlanders focused on a friendship instead of a romance.
I do like insecurities too, but sometimes they wind up being used as too much of a crutch. So THE WHOLE BOOK is about insecurities. Not cool.
Post a Comment